Skip to main content

Logos and Rhema-A lesson about verifying things for myself.

 Logos and Rhema-A lesson about verifying things for myself. 

 

I have heard for years that Logos was the written Word of God and that Rhema was the spoken Word of God. I believed this to be true but until a couple of weeks I had never looked up the definitions for myself.  I just took other people’s word for it. When I actually looked up the definitions for myself it was another lesson on why it is always important to verify thing for myself. 

 

Following definitions are from Strongs.

Logos-something said (including the thought); by implication, a topic (subject of discourse), also reasoning (the mental faculty) or motive; by extension, a computation; specially, (with the article in John) the Divine Expression (i.e. Christ):--account, cause, communication, × concerning, doctrine, fame, × have to do, intent, matter, mouth, preaching, question, reason, + reckon, remove, say(-ing), shew, × speaker, speech, talk, thing, + none of these things move me, tidings, treatise, utterance, word, work.

 

Rhema-an utterance (individually, collectively or specially),; by implication, a matter or topic (especially of narration, command or dispute); with a negative naught whatever:--+ evil, + nothing, saying, word.

 

Neither of these definitions mention anything about written.

 

I have been fortunate enough through my brief journey here to have come into contact with many different people who possess many different talents and abilities.  One of those is a man who God has gifted with languages.  Of the many languages he knows one of these is what we call New Testament Greek. He has studied the language and has taught it at college level.  So, I sent him an email to ask him for clarification and better explanation. He sent me the following.  He could of went into more detail but he kept it simple because he knows that my gifting is not languages.  I found it very helpful. 

 

As you already know, language is tricky.  Its usage changes over time.  There was a time when these words were never really associated with each other because they had a different emphasis.  At other periods of time they were used almost interchangeably.  Today the Charismatics put a great emphasis on rhema as a prophetic utterance.  This is not completely wrong but I wouldn’t handle it that way.

 

Logos is the Word.  It’s not a word.  It is the WORD.  It’s a proper name for the LORD Jesus Christ.  It is a definitive statement about something.  In Ancient Greek they thought of it this way.

 

Onoma - is the subject.

Rhema - is things said about the subject.

Logos - is the definitive statement about the subject or the heart of the discussion about the subject.  Logos is still used this way to this day.

 

For example:

 

Bios - life

Logos - the definitive statement or discussed about the subject.

Biology - the study of life

 

Soterios - salvation

Logos -    the definitive statement or discussed about the subject.

Soteriology - the study of salvation

 

etc.

 

Whenever you see -ology at the end of a word, it comes from Logos.

 

Some people say Rhema is partial knowledge.  I understand where they are coming from when they say that but it is also not a completely true statement.  Just think of rhema as talking points or something that was said.

 

**** Jhn 12:48  He that rejecteth me, and receiveth not my words, (rhema) hath one that judgeth him: the word (logos) that I have spoken, the same shall judge him in the last day.

 

(Thank the Lord for putting people in my life who are talented in ways I am not. Who can use their talents to help me.) 

As I see it God’s Word (rhema and logos) is powerful.

 

Ephesians 6:17 And take the helmet of salvation, and the sword of the Spirit, which is the word (rhema)of God;

 

Hebrews 4:12 For the word (logos) of God is living and powerful, and sharper than any two-edged sword, piercing even to the division of soul and spirit, and of joints and marrow, and is a discerner of the thoughts and intents of the heart.

 

 

When I was a kid, my Dad would give me instructions before he went to work.  Sometimes they were just verbal and other times they were written.  Thing is either way I was held accountable for those instructions.  Sometimes I would forget something.  When the instructions were verbal I had a small excuse because it is easy to forget something that someone tells you but when they were written I had no excuse because they were on paper to remind me. 

 

 

As I found out the definitions that I had been told for logos and rhema were not really correct.  I don’t believe that those who gave me those definitions were trying to deceive anyone.  I think it was more a case of ignorance and misunderstanding that was passed on and on by well-meaning people who just took other people’s definition as the truth, me among them.

Really it doesn’t matter how the Word of the Lord is communicated to us, be it written or verbal, if it is really the Word of God it is powerful, it is the truth and we will be blessed from it if we walk in it.  

 

Please don’t take my word for it. Verify it for yourself and take God’s Word for it. He is perfect and He never fails.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Thoughts from Isaiah 10:27

 Thoughts from  Isaiah 10:27   From Isaiah 10:27 we get the popular, but erroneous, sayings in the church, “the anointing breaks the yoke.” This started from the KJV translation of this verse.  Most of the other English translations have translated it as the anointing oil or fat that breaks the yoke.  The Hebrew word used in this verse is semen, pronounced sheh’-men, which means grease, especially liquid (as from the olive, often perfumed; figuratively, richness:-anointing,xfat (things), x fruitful, oil (-ed) ointment, olive, pine. (Strong’s definition). In looking at every verse where semen is used in the Old Testament it is speaking of the oil or the fat itself and not the specific act of anointing.   Now with a proper understanding of what the verse we can see the real meaning and depth of what it is saying to us even now.  To help with this I have included the verse here from 3 different English translations.    I...

The Price and Cost for more of God and His Presence

  The Price and Cost for more of God and His Presence I was reading an account of a preacher’s experience that I had previous heard him describe before in a sermon. Thought the account was familiar to me this time though it hit different.   The experience was during a time he had spent months desiring and seeking more of God and His Presence.  There were two statements that the preacher made from this account that the Lord highlighted for me.  The first was “My request for more of God carried a price” and the second was from his cry to the Lord “I must have more of You at any cost!”. These statements when I had heard them before sounded very true and I totally had agreed with them.  In fact, they had inspired me.  This time, though, was different.  This time there was at first, for a moment fear and not a Godly fear.  No, it was a fear that the price I would have to pay would be the cost of the life of one or mor...

I Thought

  I Thought This morning the Pastor was preaching from 2 Kings 5 , NIV , and there were two words that stuck out to me that he read from verse 11 that Naaman said.  “ I thought ”. I sat for a few moments and meditated on how much trouble those two words have caused in my life.  I would say that all of my failures in life involve these two words.  “I thought this was a good idea”, “I thought this is what God said”, “I thought that this would be successful”, etc.  Why do I rely on, EVER, what I think instead of what God knows?  God has given us His Word and it is never wrong and it never fails. I have never failed when I slowed down, humbled myself, searched the scriptures and followed them.  Good ideas are not good enough, experience, especially other people’s experiences aren’t good enough, even a so-called prophetic word isn’t enough on its own.  Only that which can measure up with God’s Word, the Bible , brings su...